Match predictor

• New York City FC strength rating 1620 v CF Montréal 1620
• Superior goal difference: New York City FC +4 v CF Montréal -21
• Opponent-adjusted model probability: 52% (Elo 46%, goals 61%)

Main uncertainty: Model components disagree by 14 percentage points on this outcome. No verified injury or suspension data is available for this division.

• FC Cincinnati strength rating 1620 v Philadelphia Union 1620
• Opponent-adjusted model probability: 43% (Elo 46%, goals 39%)

Main uncertainty: No verified injury or suspension data is available for this division.

• Columbus Crew strength rating 1620 v D.C. United 1620
• Superior goal difference: Columbus Crew -5 v D.C. United -12
• Opponent-adjusted model probability: 48% (Elo 46%, goals 50%)

Main uncertainty: No verified injury or suspension data is available for this division.

• FC Dallas strength rating 1620 v Sporting Kansas City 1620
• Superior goal difference: FC Dallas +7 v Sporting Kansas City -33
• Opponent-adjusted model probability: 41% (Elo 30%, goals 54%)

Main uncertainty: Model components disagree by 24 percentage points on this outcome. No verified injury or suspension data is available for this division.

• St. Louis City SC strength rating 1620 v San Diego FC 1620
• Superior goal difference: St. Louis City SC +16 v San Diego FC -3
• Opponent-adjusted model probability: 52% (Elo 46%, goals 60%)

Main uncertainty: Model components disagree by 13 percentage points on this outcome. No verified injury or suspension data is available for this division.

• San Jose Earthquakes strength rating 1620 v Real Salt Lake 1620
• Superior goal difference: San Jose Earthquakes +10 v Real Salt Lake -5
• Opponent-adjusted model probability: 50% (Elo 46%, goals 56%)

Main uncertainty: No verified injury or suspension data is available for this division.

• LA Galaxy strength rating 1620 v Austin FC 1620
• Superior goal difference: LA Galaxy -11 v Austin FC -15
• Opponent-adjusted model probability: 47% (Elo 46%, goals 48%)

Main uncertainty: No verified injury or suspension data is available for this division.

• Colorado Rapids strength rating 1620 v Chicago Fire FC 1620
• Opponent-adjusted model probability: 43% (Elo 46%, goals 39%)

Main uncertainty: No verified injury or suspension data is available for this division.

• Los Angeles FC strength rating 1608 v Minnesota United FC 1620
• Superior goal difference: Los Angeles FC +13 v Minnesota United FC -9
• Opponent-adjusted model probability: 50% (Elo 44%, goals 59%)

Main uncertainty: Model components disagree by 15 percentage points on this outcome. No verified injury or suspension data is available for this division.

• Vancouver Whitecaps FC strength rating 1620 v Seattle Sounders FC 1620
• Superior goal difference: Vancouver Whitecaps FC +31 v Seattle Sounders FC +3
• Opponent-adjusted model probability: 52% (Elo 46%, goals 60%)

Main uncertainty: Model components disagree by 14 percentage points on this outcome. No verified injury or suspension data is available for this division.

• Nashville SC strength rating 1620 v New York Red Bulls 1620
• Superior goal difference: Nashville SC +37 v New York Red Bulls -14
• Opponent-adjusted model probability: 59% (Elo 46%, goals 76%)

Main uncertainty: Model components disagree by 30 percentage points on this outcome. No verified injury or suspension data is available for this division.

• Atlanta United FC strength rating 1620 v Toronto FC 1620
• Opponent-adjusted model probability: 45% (Elo 46%, goals 43%)

Main uncertainty: No verified injury or suspension data is available for this division.

• New England Revolution strength rating 1620 v Inter Miami CF 1620
• Opponent-adjusted model probability: 45% (Elo 46%, goals 43%)

Main uncertainty: No verified injury or suspension data is available for this division.

• Portland Timbers strength rating 1620 v Houston Dynamo FC 1620
• Opponent-adjusted model probability: 45% (Elo 46%, goals 43%)

Main uncertainty: No verified injury or suspension data is available for this division.

• New York City FC strength rating 1620 v Los Angeles FC 1608
• Opponent-adjusted model probability: 44% (Elo 48%, goals 38%)

Main uncertainty: Model components disagree by 10 percentage points on this outcome. No verified injury or suspension data is available for this division.

• Chicago Fire FC strength rating 1620 v Columbus Crew 1620
• Superior goal difference: Chicago Fire FC +11 v Columbus Crew -5
• Opponent-adjusted model probability: 51% (Elo 46%, goals 56%)

Main uncertainty: Model components disagree by 10 percentage points on this outcome. No verified injury or suspension data is available for this division.

• Nashville SC strength rating 1620 v FC Cincinnati 1620
• Superior goal difference: Nashville SC +37 v FC Cincinnati -7
• Opponent-adjusted model probability: 44% (Elo 30%, goals 61%)

Main uncertainty: Model components disagree by 31 percentage points on this outcome. No verified injury or suspension data is available for this division.

• Inter Miami CF strength rating 1620 v Charlotte FC 1620
• Superior goal difference: Inter Miami CF +18 v Charlotte FC +10
• Opponent-adjusted model probability: 49% (Elo 46%, goals 52%)

Main uncertainty: No verified injury or suspension data is available for this division.

• Vancouver Whitecaps FC strength rating 1620 v CF Montréal 1620
• Superior goal difference: Vancouver Whitecaps FC +31 v CF Montréal -21
• Opponent-adjusted model probability: 44% (Elo 30%, goals 62%)

Main uncertainty: Model components disagree by 31 percentage points on this outcome. No verified injury or suspension data is available for this division.

• Orlando City SC strength rating 1620 v New England Revolution 1620
• Opponent-adjusted model probability: 42% (Elo 46%, goals 36%)

Main uncertainty: No verified injury or suspension data is available for this division.

• Philadelphia Union strength rating 1620 v Toronto FC 1620
• Superior goal difference: Philadelphia Union +11 v Toronto FC -11
• Opponent-adjusted model probability: 53% (Elo 46%, goals 61%)

Main uncertainty: Model components disagree by 15 percentage points on this outcome. No verified injury or suspension data is available for this division.

• D.C. United strength rating 1620 v New York City FC 1620
• Opponent-adjusted model probability: 41% (Elo 46%, goals 35%)

Main uncertainty: Model components disagree by 11 percentage points on this outcome. No verified injury or suspension data is available for this division.

• New York Red Bulls strength rating 1620 v Atlanta United FC 1620
• Superior goal difference: New York Red Bulls -14 v Atlanta United FC -15
• Opponent-adjusted model probability: 47% (Elo 46%, goals 47%)

Main uncertainty: No verified injury or suspension data is available for this division.

• Seattle Sounders FC strength rating 1620 v Los Angeles FC 1608
• Opponent-adjusted model probability: 43% (Elo 48%, goals 37%)

Main uncertainty: Model components disagree by 11 percentage points on this outcome. No verified injury or suspension data is available for this division.

• Minnesota United FC strength rating 1620 v San Jose Earthquakes 1620
• Opponent-adjusted model probability: 41% (Elo 46%, goals 35%)

Main uncertainty: Model components disagree by 11 percentage points on this outcome. No verified injury or suspension data is available for this division.

• Austin FC strength rating 1620 v Portland Timbers 1620
• Opponent-adjusted model probability: 43% (Elo 46%, goals 39%)

Main uncertainty: No verified injury or suspension data is available for this division.

• Houston Dynamo FC strength rating 1620 v St. Louis City SC 1620
• Opponent-adjusted model probability: 42% (Elo 46%, goals 37%)

Main uncertainty: No verified injury or suspension data is available for this division.

• FC Dallas strength rating 1620 v Colorado Rapids 1620
• Superior goal difference: FC Dallas +7 v Colorado Rapids 0
• Opponent-adjusted model probability: 48% (Elo 46%, goals 50%)

Main uncertainty: No verified injury or suspension data is available for this division.

• Real Salt Lake strength rating 1620 v LA Galaxy 1620
• Superior goal difference: Real Salt Lake -5 v LA Galaxy -11
• Opponent-adjusted model probability: 48% (Elo 46%, goals 50%)

Main uncertainty: No verified injury or suspension data is available for this division.

• San Diego FC strength rating 1620 v Sporting Kansas City 1620
• Superior goal difference: San Diego FC -3 v Sporting Kansas City -33
• Opponent-adjusted model probability: 55% (Elo 46%, goals 66%)

Main uncertainty: Model components disagree by 20 percentage points on this outcome. No verified injury or suspension data is available for this division.